Review Process

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the editorial team.

The journal applies a Double-Blind Peer Review process in which neither authors nor reviewers know each other's identities.

Initial Screening

Editors evaluate manuscripts based on:

  • Journal scope
  • Writing quality
  • Academic contribution
  • Compliance with author guidelines

Plagiarism Check

All manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software before being sent for review.

Peer Review

Eligible manuscripts are reviewed by at least two independent reviewers.

Reviewers evaluate:

  • Originality
  • Methodology
  • Significance of findings
  • Quality of analysis
  • Clarity of presentation

Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer recommendations, the editor may decide:

  • Accept Submission
  • Minor Revisions Required
  • Major Revisions Required
  • Reject Submission

The Editor-in-Chief makes the final publication decision.