Review Process

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts are initially evaluated by the editorial team.

The journal implements a Double-Blind Peer Review process, where the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process.

The review procedure consists of:

Initial Screening

The editorial team examines the manuscript to ensure:

  • Relevance to the journal scope
  • Compliance with author guidelines
  • Originality and academic quality

Plagiarism Check

All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software before entering the review stage.

Peer Review

Suitable manuscripts are sent to at least two independent reviewers.

Reviewers evaluate:

  • Originality
  • Research methodology
  • Quality of analysis
  • Contribution to the field
  • Clarity of presentation

Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer recommendations, the editor may decide:

  • Accept Submission
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Reject Submission

The final publication decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.